Before You Purchase, See an Anonymized Example of Our Diagnostic Output
Download a sample entry-tier diagnostic report for an anonymized tier-3 engineering student. See the format, depth, and specificity of the analysis you will receive — portfolio audit, SQL assessment, ATS resume check, and prioritized action plan.
What Your Diagnostic Report Will Look Like
We publish a complete anonymized sample report so you can evaluate our output before purchasing. The sample report covers an anonymized tier-3 CSE student with a typical profile: three repositories (one original project, two tutorial clones), basic SQL knowledge (JOINs but no window functions), a standard placement-cell resume format, and no deploy URLs. The report shows: the portfolio audit with specific repository-by-repository findings and a readiness score of 42/100, the SQL assessment with query-by-query breakdown showing exactly which concepts need work, the ATS resume analysis with format fixes and keyword gaps, and the prioritized action plan recommending deploy URL as Priority 1, PostgreSQL migration as Priority 2, and SQL window function practice as Priority 3. The sample is exactly what you will receive — same format, same depth, same specificity — applied to your profile instead of an anonymized one.
The sample report also demonstrates what our reports are not: they are not generic advice documents that say 'improve your SQL' without telling you which specific queries to practice. They are not motivational content dressed as analysis. They are not AI-generated text that sounds plausible but contains no actionable specifics. Every finding in the sample report includes a file:line reference, a specific code change recommendation, or a specific practice problem. This is engineering review applied to placement preparation. The sample demonstrates the standard.
System Comparison
| REPORT SECTION | WHAT IS EVALUATED | SAMPLE FINDING FROM ANONYMIZED REPORT |
|---|---|---|
| Portfolio Audit | 3 repos scanned: 1 original project (no deploy URL), 2 tutorial clones. Commit depth: 1 commit in original project. | Readiness Score: 42/100. Priority 1: Deploy original project to VPS. Priority 2: Rebuild commit history for original project showing incremental development. Priority 3: Archive tutorial clones. |
| SQL Assessment | 10 queries administered. 6/10 correct. Failed: window functions, correlated subqueries, HAVING clause. | Proficiency: Intermediate. Gap: Window functions (0/2 correct). Recommendation: Complete Mode Analytics Window Functions tutorial this week. Practice 10 ROW_NUMBER/RANK problems. |
| ATS Resume | Format: Two-column layout. ATS Extraction: Failed (text extracted as garbled fragments). Keywords: 3/12 required keywords matched. | ATS Score: 28/100. Fix: Switch to single-column format. Add specific technology names (PostgreSQL, Docker, Next.js). Move deploy URL to top quarter. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this a real student's report?
It is an anonymized composite created from real assessment data across multiple students, with all identifying information removed and details changed to protect privacy. The findings and recommendations are representative of actual diagnostic output. Your report will follow the same format and depth.